Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6): 1168-1175.DOI: 10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.20230814.002
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Yue1, ZHANG Fan2, HAN Xiaomeng2, XU Ningyang2, ZHAO Yu2, WANG Qige2, WANG Jianan2, LU Bingjiu3(), Zhang Yan4()
Received:
2022-06-12
Accepted:
2022-10-22
Online:
2023-10-25
Published:
2023-08-14
Contact:
LU Bingjiu, Department of Infectious Disease, Affiliated Hospital, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang 110000, China. lubingjiu@163.com; ZHANG Yan, Department of Cardiopulmonary rehabilitation, Affiliated hospital, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang 110000, China. Yanzhang1016@163.com. Telephone: +86-24-31961603
Supported by:
LIU Yue, ZHANG Fan, HAN Xiaomeng, XU Ningyang, ZHAO Yu, WANG Qige, WANG Jianan, LU Bingjiu, Zhang Yan. Jianpi Qutan Fang (健脾祛痰方) induces anti-atherosclerosis and ameliorates endothelial cell injury in high-fat diet rats via an anti-inflammatory and inhibiting Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription signaling pathway[J]. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2023, 43(6): 1168-1175.
Group | n | TC | TG | LDL | HDL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Normal | 6 | 198.5±34.7a | 36.7±7.3a | 32.0±4.5a | 73.6±4.6a |
Model | 6 | 569.4±56.5b | 103.1±3.2b | 90.4±9.6b | 17.9±3.1b |
Atorvastatin | 6 | 438.0±27.1ab | 90.0±4.6ab | 64.3±5.7ab | 49.5±2.6ab |
Quarter-dose JPQT | 6 | 510.7±28.3ac | 102.2±3.0d | 87.0±3.0d | 32.5±1.8ab |
Half-dose JPQT | 6 | 467.2±21.8ab | 97.5±1.7d | 76.6±2.4ab | 33.4±2.8ab |
JPQT | 6 | 367.2±43.5ab | 90.6±3.7ab | 63.6±5.6ab | 48.5±3.2ab |
Double-dose JPQT | 6 | 321.1±42.9ab | 76.4±7.1ab | 53.5±4.6ab | 61.4±2.8ab |
Quadruple-dose JPQT | 6 | 208.2±38.8a | 56.1±6.1ab | 46.9±2.7ab | 70.3±5.3a |
F value | 76.395 | 137.444 | 37.491 | 194.175 | |
P value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 1 Effect of JPQT on rat serum lipid levels (μmol/L, $\bar{x}$ ± s)
Group | n | TC | TG | LDL | HDL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Normal | 6 | 198.5±34.7a | 36.7±7.3a | 32.0±4.5a | 73.6±4.6a |
Model | 6 | 569.4±56.5b | 103.1±3.2b | 90.4±9.6b | 17.9±3.1b |
Atorvastatin | 6 | 438.0±27.1ab | 90.0±4.6ab | 64.3±5.7ab | 49.5±2.6ab |
Quarter-dose JPQT | 6 | 510.7±28.3ac | 102.2±3.0d | 87.0±3.0d | 32.5±1.8ab |
Half-dose JPQT | 6 | 467.2±21.8ab | 97.5±1.7d | 76.6±2.4ab | 33.4±2.8ab |
JPQT | 6 | 367.2±43.5ab | 90.6±3.7ab | 63.6±5.6ab | 48.5±3.2ab |
Double-dose JPQT | 6 | 321.1±42.9ab | 76.4±7.1ab | 53.5±4.6ab | 61.4±2.8ab |
Quadruple-dose JPQT | 6 | 208.2±38.8a | 56.1±6.1ab | 46.9±2.7ab | 70.3±5.3a |
F value | 76.395 | 137.444 | 37.491 | 194.175 | |
P value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Group | n | IL-1β (ng/L) | IL-6 (pg/mL) | IL-8 (ng/L) | IL-10 (ng/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Normal | 6 | 12.8±1.8a | 26.9±2.1a | 138.3±6.8a | 47.4±2.1a |
Model | 6 | 29.8±0.9b | 76.0±1.6b | 317.1±9.1b | 18.3±1.5b |
Atorvastatin | 6 | 22.0±0.5ab | 56.0±1.7ab | 253.1±18.1ab | 41.2±1.9ab |
Quarter-dose JPQT | 6 | 27.1±1.5ab | 68.4±1.8ab | 284.5±11.8ab | 28.6±2.1ab |
Half-dose JPQT | 6 | 23.5±1.2ab | 63.6±1.8ab | 284.0±6.7ab | 32.3±2.2ab |
JPQT | 6 | 21.7±0.5ab | 55.4±2.5ab | 249.9±9.4ab | 38.5±1.1ab |
Double-dose JPQT | 6 | 19.5±0.7ab | 47.2±2.0ab | 203.4±14.9ab | 41.3±1.4ab |
Quadruple-dose JPQT | 6 | 18.5±1.2ab | 40.3±3.7ab | 174.4±8.4ab | 46.2±1.2ab |
F value | 127.489 | 296.516 | 174.695 | 131.482 | |
P value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 2 Effect of JPQT on rat serum inflammatory cytokines levels ($\bar{x}$ ± s)
Group | n | IL-1β (ng/L) | IL-6 (pg/mL) | IL-8 (ng/L) | IL-10 (ng/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Normal | 6 | 12.8±1.8a | 26.9±2.1a | 138.3±6.8a | 47.4±2.1a |
Model | 6 | 29.8±0.9b | 76.0±1.6b | 317.1±9.1b | 18.3±1.5b |
Atorvastatin | 6 | 22.0±0.5ab | 56.0±1.7ab | 253.1±18.1ab | 41.2±1.9ab |
Quarter-dose JPQT | 6 | 27.1±1.5ab | 68.4±1.8ab | 284.5±11.8ab | 28.6±2.1ab |
Half-dose JPQT | 6 | 23.5±1.2ab | 63.6±1.8ab | 284.0±6.7ab | 32.3±2.2ab |
JPQT | 6 | 21.7±0.5ab | 55.4±2.5ab | 249.9±9.4ab | 38.5±1.1ab |
Double-dose JPQT | 6 | 19.5±0.7ab | 47.2±2.0ab | 203.4±14.9ab | 41.3±1.4ab |
Quadruple-dose JPQT | 6 | 18.5±1.2ab | 40.3±3.7ab | 174.4±8.4ab | 46.2±1.2ab |
F value | 127.489 | 296.516 | 174.695 | 131.482 | |
P value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Group | n | Complex I | Complex Ⅱ | Complex Ⅲ | Complex Ⅳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Normal | 6 | 6375±261a | 1265±202a | 1011±63a | 4608±215a |
Model | 6 | 1618±407b | 199±38b | 231±27b | 555±70b |
Atorvastatin | 6 | 4848±164ab | 762±44ab | 516±26ab | 2839±153ab |
Quarter-dose JPQT | 6 | 3207±193ab | 257±29b | 323±20ab | 1003±158ab |
Half-dose JPQT | 6 | 3992±241ab | 609±13ab | 354±29ab | 1561±169ab |
JPQT | 6 | 4572±145ab | 687±81ab | 452±23ab | 2351±130ab |
Double-dose JPQT | 6 | 5186±137ab | 944±55ab | 647±34ab | 3150±144ab |
Quadruple-dose JPQT | 6 | 5918±233ab | 1029±44ab | 873±34ab | 3763±249ab |
F value | 249.455 | 114.437 | 380.62 | 406.357 | |
P value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 3 Measurement of mitochondrial respiratory enzyme activity (U/g, $\bar{x}$ ± s)
Group | n | Complex I | Complex Ⅱ | Complex Ⅲ | Complex Ⅳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Normal | 6 | 6375±261a | 1265±202a | 1011±63a | 4608±215a |
Model | 6 | 1618±407b | 199±38b | 231±27b | 555±70b |
Atorvastatin | 6 | 4848±164ab | 762±44ab | 516±26ab | 2839±153ab |
Quarter-dose JPQT | 6 | 3207±193ab | 257±29b | 323±20ab | 1003±158ab |
Half-dose JPQT | 6 | 3992±241ab | 609±13ab | 354±29ab | 1561±169ab |
JPQT | 6 | 4572±145ab | 687±81ab | 452±23ab | 2351±130ab |
Double-dose JPQT | 6 | 5186±137ab | 944±55ab | 647±34ab | 3150±144ab |
Quadruple-dose JPQT | 6 | 5918±233ab | 1029±44ab | 873±34ab | 3763±249ab |
F value | 249.455 | 114.437 | 380.62 | 406.357 | |
P value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Figure 1 JPQT ameliorated histopathological changes in rat aorta (HE staining, ×200) A: normal control group (normal diet + normal saline); B: model group (HFD + normal saline); C: Atorvastatin group (8 weeks, HFD + 10 mg/kg Atorvastatin); D: Quarter-dose Jianpi Qutan Fang (8 weeks, HFD + 2.225 g/kg Jianpi Qutan Fang); E: Half-dose Jianpi Qutan Fang (8 weeks, HFD + 4.45 g/kg Jianpi Qutan Fang); F: Jianpi Qutan Fang (8 weeks, HFD + 8.9 g/kg Jianpi Qutan Fang); G: Double-dose Jianpi Qutan Fang (8 weeks, HFD + 17.8 g/kg Jianpi Qutan Fang); H: Quadruple-dose Jianpi Qutan Fang (8 weeks, HFD + 35.6 g/kg Jianpi Qutan Fang). JPQT: Jianpi Qutan Fang; HE: hematoxylin-eosin staining.
Figure 2 JPQT ameliorated ultrastructural changes in rat aorta Transmission electron microscope observe the subcellular structure of the thoracic aorta. A-B: normal control group (normal diet + normal saline), C-D: model group (HFD + normal saline), E: atorvastatin group (8 weeks, HFD + 10 mg/kg Atorvastatin), F: JPQT group (8 weeks, HFD + 8.9 g/kg JPQT), G: double-dose JPQT group (8 weeks, HFD + 17.8 g/kg JPQT), H: quadruple-dose JPQT group (8 weeks, HFD + 35.6 g/kg JPQT). Scale bar = 2 μm. Red arrow: the endothelial cells; blue arrow: the blood cells; pink arrow: elastic fibers and collagen fibers; green arrow: mitochondria.
Figure 3 JPQT inhibited JAK/STAT signaling pathway via upregulating SOCS1 protein expression in the aortic tissues of HFD fed rat A: expression of aortic SOCS1/JAK1/STAT1 signaling pathway proteins levels by Western blot; B: normalized against GAPDH. 1: Normal: normal control group (normal diet + normal saline); 2: Model: model group (HFD + normal saline); 3: Atorvastatin: atorvastatin group (HFD + 10 mg/kg Atorvastatin); 4: Quarter-dose JPQT: quarter-dose Jianpi Qutan Fang (HFD + 2.225 g/kg JPQT); 5: Half-dose JPQT: half-dose Jianpi Qutan Fang (HFD + 4.45 g/kg JPQT); 6: JPQT: Jianpi Qutan Fang (HFD + 8.9 g/kg JPQT); 7: Double-dose JPQT: double-doseJianpi Qutan Fang (HFD + 17.8 g/kg JPQT); 8: Quadruple-dose JPQT: quadruple-dose Jianpi Qutan Fang (HFD + 35.6 g/kg JPQT). JPQT: Jianpi Qutan Fang; JAK: Janus kinase; STAT: signal transducer and activator of transcription; SOCS1: suppressor of cytokine signaling 1; HFD: high-fat diet. Student t-test and one-way analysis of variance were used for comparison analysis. aP < 0.01 compared with model group; bP < 0. 01 compared with the normal group; cP < 0.05 compared with model group; dP < 0.05 compared with the normal group. Statistical significance between the groups was determined by one-way analysis of variance. The sample size for each group was 5.
1. | Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2018 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2018; 137: e67-492. |
2. | Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017; 135: e146-603. |
3. |
Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration, Di Angelantonio E, Sarwar N, et al. Major lipids, apolipoproteins, and risk of vascular disease. JAMA 2009; 302: 1993-2000.
DOI PMID |
4. |
Zhao XX, Liu J, Zhao H, et al. The effect of cardiovascular risk factors on the carotid intima-media thickness in an old-aged cohort with hypertension: a longitudinal evolution with 4-year follow-up of a random clinical trial. Clin Exp Hypertens 2019; 41: 49-57.
DOI URL |
5. |
Toth PP. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins as a causal factor for cardiovascular disease. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2016; 12: 171-83.
DOI PMID |
6. |
Poznyak A, Grechko AV, Poggio P, et al. The diabetes mellitus-atherosclerosis connection: the role of lipid and glucose metabolism and chronic inflammation. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21: 1835.
DOI URL |
7. |
Nimai C Chandra. Atherosclerosis and carcinoma: two facets of dysfunctional cholesterol homeostasis. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 2020; 34: e22595.
DOI URL |
8. |
Meurer L, Cohen SM. Drug-induced liver injury from statins. Clin Liver Dis 2020; 24: 107-19.
DOI PMID |
9. |
Vinci P, Panizon E, Tosoni LM, et al. Statin-associated myopathy: emphasis on mechanisms and targeted therapy. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22: 11687.
DOI URL |
10. | Wu PS (Wei dynasty), Sun XY (Qing dynasty), Feng MY (Qing dynasty. Shen Nong Ben Cao Jing. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 1984: 27. |
11. |
Wang Y, Liu L, Ma Y, et al. Chemical discrimination of Astragalus mongholicus and Astragalus membranaceus based on metabolomics using UHPLC-ESI-Q-TOF-MS/MS Approach. Molecules 2019; 24: 4064.
DOI URL |
12. |
Zhu Z, Li J, Zhang X. Astragaloside Ⅳ protects against oxidized low-density lipoprotein (ox-LDL)-induced endothelial cell injury by reducing oxidative stress and inflammation. Med Sci Monit 2019; 25: 2132-40.
DOI URL |
13. | Yang Y, Pei K, Zhang Q, et al. Salvianolic acid B ameliorates atherosclerosis via inhibiting YAP/TAZ/JNK signaling pathway in endothelial cells and pericytes. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids 2020; 1865: 158779. |
14. |
Wang YL, Zhang Q, Yin SJ, et al. Screening of blood-activating active components from Danshen-Honghua herbal pair by spectrum-effect relationship analysis. Phytomedicine 2019; 54: 149-58.
DOI URL |
15. |
Li ZM, Xu SW, Liu PQ. Salvia miltiorrhiza Burge (Danshen): a golden herbal medicine in cardiovascular therapeutics. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2018; 39: 802-24.
DOI URL |
16. | Aguilar-Ballester M, Herrero-Cervera A, Vinué Á, Martínez-Hervás S, González-Navarro H. Impact of cholesterol metabolism in immune cell function and atherosclerosis. Nutrients 2020; 12: 2021. |
17. |
Wojda A, Janczy A, Małgorzewicz S. Mediterranean, vegetarian and vegan diets as practical outtakes of EAS and ACC/AHA recommendations for lowering lipid profile. Acta Biochim Pol 2021; 68: 41-8.
DOI PMID |
18. | Ouchi Y, Sasaki J, Arai H, et al. Ezetimibe lipid-lowering trial on prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in 75 or older (EWTOPIA 75): a randomized, controlled trial. Circulation 2019;140: 992-1003. |
19. |
Xu Y, Li F, Zhao X, et al. Methionine sulfoxide reductase a attenuates atherosclerosis via repairing dysfunctional HDL in scavenger receptor class B type I deficient mice. FASEB J 2020; 34: 3805-19.
DOI URL |
20. |
Pownall HJ, Rosales C, Gillard BK, Gotto AM Jr. High-density lipoproteins, reverse cholesterol transport and atherogenesis. Nat Rev Cardiol 2021; 18: 712-23.
DOI PMID |
21. |
Bonaventura A, Montecucco F, Dallegri F, et al. Novel findings in neutrophil biology and their impact on cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Res 2019; 115: 1266-85.
DOI PMID |
22. |
Persson J, Nilsson J, Lindholm MW. Interleukin-1beta and tumour necrosis factor-alpha impede neutral lipid turnover in macrophage-derived foam cells. BMC Immunol 2008; 9: 70.
DOI PMID |
23. |
Hartman J, Frishman WH. Inflammation and atherosclerosis: a review of the role of interleukin-6 in the development of atherosclerosis and the potential for targeted drug therapy. Cardiol Rev 2014; 22: 147-51.
DOI PMID |
24. | Zhang L, Li HY, Li H, et al. Lipopolysaccharide activated phosphatidylcholine -specific phospholipase C and induced IL-8 and MCP-1 production in vascular endothelial cells. J Cell Physiol 2011;226: 1694-701. |
25. | Kamari Y, Shaish A, Shemesh S, et al. Reduced atherosclerosis and inflammatory cytokines in apolipoprotein-E-deficient mice lacking bone marrow-derived interleukin-1α. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2011; 405: 197-203. |
26. |
Kahraman S, Yilmaz R, Arici M, et al. IL-10 genotype predicts serum levels of adhesion molecules, inflammation and athero-sclerosis in hemodialysis patients. J Nephrol 2006; 19: 50-6.
PMID |
27. |
Yu CR, Mahdi RR, Oh HM, et al. Suppressor of cytokine signaling-1 (SOCS1) inhibits lymphocyte recruitment into the retina and protects SOCS1 transgenic rats and mice from ocular inflammation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 6978-86.
DOI URL |
28. | Baldini C, Moriconi FR, Galimberti S, Libby P, De Caterina R. The JAK-STAT pathway: an emerging target for cardiovascular disease in rheumatoid arthritis and myeloproliferative neoplasms. Eur Heart J 2021;4 2: 4389-400. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Sponsored by China Association of Chinese Medicine
& China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
16 Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimen Nei, Beijing, China. 100700 Email: jtcmen@126.com
Copyright 2020 Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine. All rights reserved.