Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 30-38.DOI: 10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.2022.01.003
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Xiaolan SU, Tao ZHANG, Song GUO, Xin WANG, Lin CHEN, Wei WEI()
Received:
2020-11-21
Accepted:
2021-02-26
Online:
2022-01-25
Published:
2022-01-25
Contact:
Wei WEI
About author:
Prof. WEI Wei, Gastroenterology department, Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medicinal Sciences, Beijing 100102, China. sxxtyy@sina.comSupported by:
Xiaolan SU, Tao ZHANG, Song GUO, Xin WANG, Lin CHEN, Wei WEI. Efficacy of Wumei Baijiang prescription (乌梅败酱方) on regulatory T cells / helper T cells Immune balance in mice with ulcerative colitiss[J]. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2022, 42(1): 30-38.
Group | n | 0 d | 5 d | 7 d | 10 d | 13 d | 17 d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NG | 6 | 3.9±0.4 | 3.4±0.7 | 3.7±0.6 | 3.4±0.6 | 3.5±0.6 | 3.8±0.6 |
MG | 6 | 3.7±0.8 | 2.7±0.5a | 1.3±0.4a | 1.7±0.6a | 2.3±0.6a | 2.9±0.6a |
CG | 6 | 3.8±0.7 | 2.5±0.7a | 1.3±0.5a | 2.3±0.6a | 3.1±0.5b | 3.7±0.4b |
WHG | 6 | 4.1±0.7 | 2.3±0.7a | 1.4±0.8a | 2.3±0.5a | 3.2±0.7b | 3.6±0.5b |
WMG | 6 | 3.8±0.5 | 2.4±0.6a | 1.4±0.6a | 2.2±0.5a | 3.2±0.6b | 3.6±0.7b |
WLG | 6 | 3.7±0.6 | 2.3±0.7a | 1.4±0.8a | 1.9±0.5a | 2.9±0.5 | 3.1±0.4a |
Table 1 Comparison of food intake of mice in each group ($bar{x}$ ± s)
Group | n | 0 d | 5 d | 7 d | 10 d | 13 d | 17 d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NG | 6 | 3.9±0.4 | 3.4±0.7 | 3.7±0.6 | 3.4±0.6 | 3.5±0.6 | 3.8±0.6 |
MG | 6 | 3.7±0.8 | 2.7±0.5a | 1.3±0.4a | 1.7±0.6a | 2.3±0.6a | 2.9±0.6a |
CG | 6 | 3.8±0.7 | 2.5±0.7a | 1.3±0.5a | 2.3±0.6a | 3.1±0.5b | 3.7±0.4b |
WHG | 6 | 4.1±0.7 | 2.3±0.7a | 1.4±0.8a | 2.3±0.5a | 3.2±0.7b | 3.6±0.5b |
WMG | 6 | 3.8±0.5 | 2.4±0.6a | 1.4±0.6a | 2.2±0.5a | 3.2±0.6b | 3.6±0.7b |
WLG | 6 | 3.7±0.6 | 2.3±0.7a | 1.4±0.8a | 1.9±0.5a | 2.9±0.5 | 3.1±0.4a |
Group | n | 0 d | 5 d | 7 d | 10 d | 13 d | 17 d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NG | 6 | 23.1±0.8 | 23.9±0.9 | 24.1±0.5 | 24.3±0.9 | 24.8±1.1 | 24.9±1.2 |
MG | 6 | 23.3±0.5 | 22.4±0.8 | 21.3±0.7a | 18.7±1.2a | 20.9±1.5a | 22.0±1.2a |
CG | 6 | 23.4±0.7 | 22.5±0.8 | 21.7±1.1a | 19.7±1.5a | 22.5±1.2ab | 23.8±1.3b |
WHG | 6 | 23.2±0.6 | 22.7±0.6 | 21.9±1.2a | 19.6±2.1a | 22.7±2.9ab | 23.9±2.1ab |
WMG | 6 | 23.9±0.4 | 22.2±0.7 | 21.4±1.7a | 19.5±1.2a | 22.5±1.8ab | 23.7±1.5ab |
WLG | 6 | 23.2±0.7 | 22.5±0.9 | 21.1±0.8a | 19.0±0.7a | 20.5±1.7a | 21.7±1.4a |
Table 2 Comparison of weight change of mice in each group ($bar{x}$ ± s)
Group | n | 0 d | 5 d | 7 d | 10 d | 13 d | 17 d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NG | 6 | 23.1±0.8 | 23.9±0.9 | 24.1±0.5 | 24.3±0.9 | 24.8±1.1 | 24.9±1.2 |
MG | 6 | 23.3±0.5 | 22.4±0.8 | 21.3±0.7a | 18.7±1.2a | 20.9±1.5a | 22.0±1.2a |
CG | 6 | 23.4±0.7 | 22.5±0.8 | 21.7±1.1a | 19.7±1.5a | 22.5±1.2ab | 23.8±1.3b |
WHG | 6 | 23.2±0.6 | 22.7±0.6 | 21.9±1.2a | 19.6±2.1a | 22.7±2.9ab | 23.9±2.1ab |
WMG | 6 | 23.9±0.4 | 22.2±0.7 | 21.4±1.7a | 19.5±1.2a | 22.5±1.8ab | 23.7±1.5ab |
WLG | 6 | 23.2±0.7 | 22.5±0.9 | 21.1±0.8a | 19.0±0.7a | 20.5±1.7a | 21.7±1.4a |
Group | n | 0 d | 5 d | 7 d | 10 d | 13 d | 17 d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NG | 6 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.06±0.13 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.03±0.09 | 0.06±0.13 | 0.03±0.09 |
MG | 6 | 0.00±0.00 | 1.51±0.78a | 3.10±0.75a | 2.63±0.40a | 1.94±0.53a | 1.46±0.41a |
CG | 6 | 0.00±0.00 | 1.53±0.87a | 2.77±1.11a | 2.17±0.43ab | 1.03±0.46ab | 0.52±0.41b |
WHG | 6 | 0.00±0.00 | 1.43±0.76a | 2.50±0.95a | 2.47±1.11a | 1.01±0.98ab | 0.56±0.68ab |
WMG | 6 | 0.03±0.09 | 1.95±0.86a | 3.32±0.61a | 2.61±0.78a | 1.10±0.10ab | 0.61±0.54ab |
WLG | 6 | 0.00±0.00 | 1.92±0.83a | 2.80±0.98a | 2.32±0.25a | 1.72±0.83a | 1.21±0.59a |
Table 3 Comparison of DAI score of mice in each group ($bar{x}$ ± s)
Group | n | 0 d | 5 d | 7 d | 10 d | 13 d | 17 d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NG | 6 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.06±0.13 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.03±0.09 | 0.06±0.13 | 0.03±0.09 |
MG | 6 | 0.00±0.00 | 1.51±0.78a | 3.10±0.75a | 2.63±0.40a | 1.94±0.53a | 1.46±0.41a |
CG | 6 | 0.00±0.00 | 1.53±0.87a | 2.77±1.11a | 2.17±0.43ab | 1.03±0.46ab | 0.52±0.41b |
WHG | 6 | 0.00±0.00 | 1.43±0.76a | 2.50±0.95a | 2.47±1.11a | 1.01±0.98ab | 0.56±0.68ab |
WMG | 6 | 0.03±0.09 | 1.95±0.86a | 3.32±0.61a | 2.61±0.78a | 1.10±0.10ab | 0.61±0.54ab |
WLG | 6 | 0.00±0.00 | 1.92±0.83a | 2.80±0.98a | 2.32±0.25a | 1.72±0.83a | 1.21±0.59a |
Figure 1 Colon tissue’s HE staining results of mice in each group (× 200) A: NG: normal group (saline, 0.5 mL/d); B: MG: model group (saline, 0.5 mL/d); C: CG: mesalazine group (0.52 g·kg-1·d-1); D: WHG: high dose group of Wumei Baijiang prescription (0.736 g·kg-1·d-1); E: WMG: dose group of Wumei Baijiang prescription (0.368 g·kg-1·d-1); F: WLG: low dose group of Wumei Baijiang prescription (0.184 g·kg-1·d-1). Treatment course: 10 d.
Group | Treg | Th17 | CD4+ | CD8+ | CD4/CD8 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NG | 5.23±0.32 | 1.55±0.42 | 18.42±1.44 | 9.69±1.23 | 1.98±0.13 |
MG | 2.27±0.78a | 4.00±0.62a | 12.73±1.89a | 15.91±1.32a | 0.79±0.76 |
CG | 4.75±1.32b | 2.20±0.56b | 17.53±1.61b | 10.31±1.34b | 1.68±0.98 |
WHG | 4.28±0.50b | 2.38±0.62b | 16.33±1.93b | 10.19±1.56b | 1.59±0.87 |
WMG | 4.26±1.53b | 2.56±0.78b | 16.17±1.95b | 11.55±2.01b | 1.39±0.96 |
WLG | 2.48±1.01a | 3.67±1.47a | 13.5±1.26a | 13.21±1.78a | 1.02±0.88 |
Table 4 T lymphocyte and ratio of mice in each group (%,$bar{x}$ ± s)
Group | Treg | Th17 | CD4+ | CD8+ | CD4/CD8 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NG | 5.23±0.32 | 1.55±0.42 | 18.42±1.44 | 9.69±1.23 | 1.98±0.13 |
MG | 2.27±0.78a | 4.00±0.62a | 12.73±1.89a | 15.91±1.32a | 0.79±0.76 |
CG | 4.75±1.32b | 2.20±0.56b | 17.53±1.61b | 10.31±1.34b | 1.68±0.98 |
WHG | 4.28±0.50b | 2.38±0.62b | 16.33±1.93b | 10.19±1.56b | 1.59±0.87 |
WMG | 4.26±1.53b | 2.56±0.78b | 16.17±1.95b | 11.55±2.01b | 1.39±0.96 |
WLG | 2.48±1.01a | 3.67±1.47a | 13.5±1.26a | 13.21±1.78a | 1.02±0.88 |
Figure 2 Comparison of Trge cells in the spleen of mice in each group A: NG: normal group; B: MG: model group; C: CG: mesalazine group (0.52 g·kg-1·d-1); D: WHG: high dose group of Wumei Baijiang prescription (0.736 g·kg-1·d-1); E: WMG: dose group of Wumei Baijiang prescription (0.368 g·k-g1·d-1); F: WLG: low dose group of Wumei Baijiang prescription (0.184 g·kg-1·d-1). Treatment course: 10 d.
Figure 3 Comparison of Th17 cells in the spleen of mice in each group. A: NG: normal group; B: MG: model group; C: CG: mesalazine group (0.52 g·kg-1·d-1); D: WHG: high dose group of Wumei Baijiang prescription (0.736 g·kg-1·d-1); E: WMG: dose group of Wumei Baijiang prescription (0.368 g·kg-1·d-1); F: WLG: low dose group of Wumei Baijiang prescription (0.184 g·kg-1·d-1). Treatment course: 10 d.
Figure 4 Comparison of CD4+T cells in the spleen of mice in each grou A: NG: normal group; B: MG: model group; C: CG: mesalazine group (0.52 g·kg-1·d-1); D: WHG: high dose group of Wumei Baijiang prescription (0.736 g·kg-1·d-1); E: WMG: dose group of Wumei Baijiang prescription (0.368 g·kg-1·d-1); F: WLG: low dose group of Wumei Baijiang prescription (0.184 g·kg-1·d-1) . Treatment course: 10 d.
Figure 5 Comparison of CD8+T cells in the spleen of mice in each group A: NG: normal group; B: MG: model group; C: CG: mesalazine group (0.52 g·kg-1·d-1); D: WHG: high dose group of Wumei Baijiang prescription (0.736 g·kg-1·d-1); E: WMG: dose group of Wumei Baijiang prescription (0.368 g·kg-1·d-1); F: WLG: low dose group of Wumei Baijiang prescription (0.184 g·kg-1·d-1) ;Treatment course: 10 d.
Groups | n | TNF-α (pg/mL) | IL-10 (pg/mL) | CRP (mg/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|
NG | 6 | 126.41±4.56 | 10.50±0.94 | 1.10±0.11 |
MG | 6 | 275.51±5.457a | 4.48±0.87a | 5.21±0.36a |
CG | 6 | 188.72±5.36ab | 9.27±0.68ab | 2.00±0.11ab |
WHG | 6 | 186.75±5.91ab | 9.43±0.34ab | 1.99±0.12ab |
WMG | 6 | 223.79±8.25ab | 8.52±0.57ab | 2.43±0.20ab |
WLG | 6 | 241.59±5.48ab | 5.63±0.49a | 3.45±0.12ab |
Table 5 Comparison of TNF-α, IL-10 and CRP of mice in each group ($bar{x}$ ± s)
Groups | n | TNF-α (pg/mL) | IL-10 (pg/mL) | CRP (mg/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|
NG | 6 | 126.41±4.56 | 10.50±0.94 | 1.10±0.11 |
MG | 6 | 275.51±5.457a | 4.48±0.87a | 5.21±0.36a |
CG | 6 | 188.72±5.36ab | 9.27±0.68ab | 2.00±0.11ab |
WHG | 6 | 186.75±5.91ab | 9.43±0.34ab | 1.99±0.12ab |
WMG | 6 | 223.79±8.25ab | 8.52±0.57ab | 2.43±0.20ab |
WLG | 6 | 241.59±5.48ab | 5.63±0.49a | 3.45±0.12ab |
[1] | Ng SC, Shi HY, Hamidi N, et al. Worldwide incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in the 21st century: a systematic review of population-based studies. Lancet 2018;390:2769-78. |
[2] | Kessler S, Rho H, West G, Fiocchi C, Drazba J, de la Motte C. Hyaluronan (HA) deposition precedes and promotes leukocyte recruitment in intestinal inflammation. Clin Transl Sci 2006;1:57-61. |
[3] | Murano. M, Maemura K, Hirata I, et a1. Therapeutic effect of in tracolonIcally administered nuclear factorkappa B (p65) Antisenseolig on ucleotide on mouse dextran sulphate sodium (DSS) inducedcolitis Clin Exp Immuno 2000;120:51-8. |
[4] | Hirata Y, Ihara S, Koike K. Targeting the complex interactions between microbiota, host epithelial and immune cells in inflam-matory bowel disease. Pharmacol Re. 2016;113(Pt A):574-84. |
[5] | Eastaff-Leung N, Mabarrack N, Barbour A, Cummins A, Barry S. Foxp3+ regulatory T cells, Th17 effector cells, and cytokine environment in inflammatory bowel disease. J Clin Immunol 2010;30:80-9. |
[6] | Ma HQ, Zhao XJ, Zhang HJ. The expression of serum inflammatory markers and Th17/Treg cells in patients with ulcerative colitis and the clinical significance. Wei Chang Bing Xue Yu Gan Bing Xue 2018;27:885-90. |
[7] | He ZC, Lin N, Yin PF. The relationship between the imbalance of Th17/Treg cells and the degree of disease activity and inflammation in patients with ulcerative colitis. Zhong Guo Yi Yao Dao Bao 2019;16:130-3. |
[8] | Liu ZY, Cao H. Meta-analysis of Th17, Treg and Th17/Treg Cells in Peripheral Blood of Patients with Ulcerative Colitis. Shi Yong Zhong Yi Nei Ke Za Zhi 2020;34:109-13. |
[9] | Song YF, Pei LX, Zhao TT, Sun JH. Research progress on the pathogenesis of immune factors in ulcerative colitis. Yi Xue Yan Jiu Sheng Xue Bao 2019;32:432-6. |
[10] | Li PR, Wei R, Wu ZP, Zhang DK. Function and research progress of Th17/Treg cells and their related cytokines in pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis. Shi Jie Ke Ji Yan Jiu Yu Fa Zhan 2017;39:194-7. |
[11] | Chen Q. Methodology for pharmacological research of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2006: 1103 |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Sponsored by China Association of Chinese Medicine
& China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
16 Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimen Nei, Beijing, China. 100700 Email: jtcmen@126.com
Copyright 2020 Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine. All rights reserved.