Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 1218-1229.DOI: 10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.20260514.001
• Original Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
GAN Lin1,2, ZHOU Fangfang1, QIU Yingying3, HUANG Meihua1, LI Zhenli1(
), GUI Tao1(
)
Received:2025-05-22
Accepted:2026-02-09
Online:2026-10-15
Published:2026-05-14
Contact:
GUI Tao, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210028, China. guitao@jsatcm.com; LI Zhenli, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210028, China. lizhenli79@163.com,Telephone: +86-25-85630285
About author:GAN Lin and ZHOU Fangfang are co-first authors and contributed equally to this work
Supported by:GAN Lin, ZHOU Fangfang, QIU Yingying, HUANG Meihua, LI Zhenli, GUI Tao. Integrative network pharmacology and experimental validation to decipher the anti-angiogenic mechanisms of Xuandan Sanjie decotion (玄丹散结汤) in adenomyosis[J]. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2026, 46(5): 1218-1229.
Figure 1 Identification of chemical constituents in XSD by UHPLC-MS/MS A: A1: XSD in ESI positive mode; A2: XSD in ESI negative mode. The red numbers in the mass spectrum represent 20 identified compounds. 1: kaempferol; 2: coumaric acid; 3: sclareol; 4: nicotinic acid; 5: palmatine; 6: allocryptopine; 7: acetophenone; 8: boldine; 9: camphor; 10: linderane; 11: apigenin; 12: kaempferol; 13: azelaic acid; 14: naringenin; 15: isoimperatorin; 16: coumaric acid; 17: caffeic acid; 18: cirsimaritin; 19: vanillic acid; 20: quercetin; B: metabolite class composition ring diagram; C: sankey diagram illustrating relationships between the ingredients and source herbs in XSD. XSD: Xuandan Sanjie decoction; UHPLC-MS/MS: ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry; ESI: electrospray ionization.
| No. | Compound | Formula | mzmed | ms2Adduct | Relative content | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kaempferol | C15H10O6 | 287.055 | [M+H]+ | 3860556.051 | Flavonoids |
| 2 | Coumaric acid | C9H8O3 | 147.043 | [M+H-H2O]+ | 42418783.33 | Phenylpropanoids |
| 3 | sclareol | C20H36O2 | 326.305 | [M+NH4]+ | 31763629.87 | Terpenoids |
| 4 | Nicotinic acid | C6H5NO2 | 124.039 | [M+H] | 87096072.94 | Alkaloid |
| 5 | Palmatine | C21H22NO4 | 352.153 | [M]+ | 1414855.134 | Alkaloid |
| 6 | Allocryptopine | C21H23NO5 | 370.165 | [M+H] | 20554792.16 | Alkaloid |
| 7 | Acetophenone | C8H8O | 121.064 | [M+H] | 4027023.846 | Phenols |
| 8 | Boldine | C19H21NO4 | 328.153 | [M+H]+ | 4970057868 | Alkaloid |
| 9 | Camphor | C10H16O | 153.127 | [M+H] | 1193613.001 | Terpenoids |
| 10 | Linderane | C15H16O4 | 261.111 | [M+H] | 103593915.9 | Terpenoids |
| 11 | Apigenin | C15H10O5 | 269.045 | [M-H]- | 2469278.777 | Flavonoids |
| 12 | Kaempferol | C15H10O6 | 285.042 | [M-H]- | 3370501.518 | Flavonoids |
| 13 | Azelaic acid | C9H16O4 | 187.097 | [M-H]- | 6112865.346 | Aliphatic acyl |
| 14 | Naringenin | C15H12O5 | 271.060 | [M-H] | 7626711.301 | Flavonoids |
| 15 | isoimperatorin | C16H14O4 | 269.082 | [M-H]- | 11272505.7 | Phenylpropanoids |
| 16 | Coumaric acid | C9H8O3 | 163.039 | [M-H]- | 12214940.45 | Phenylpropanoids |
| 17 | Caffeic acid | C9H8O4 | 179.034 | [M-H]- | 42289183.19 | Phenylpropanoids |
| 18 | cirsimaritin | C17H14O6 | 313.071 | [M-H]- | 55540661.17 | Flavonoids |
| 19 | Vanillic acid | C8H8O4 | 167.034 | [M-H]- | 67417507.56 | Cinnamic acid derivatives |
| 20 | Quercetin | C15H10O7 | 301.037 | [M-H]- | 3860556.051 | Flavonoids |
Table 1 Characterization of compounds of XSD by UPLC-MS/MS
| No. | Compound | Formula | mzmed | ms2Adduct | Relative content | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kaempferol | C15H10O6 | 287.055 | [M+H]+ | 3860556.051 | Flavonoids |
| 2 | Coumaric acid | C9H8O3 | 147.043 | [M+H-H2O]+ | 42418783.33 | Phenylpropanoids |
| 3 | sclareol | C20H36O2 | 326.305 | [M+NH4]+ | 31763629.87 | Terpenoids |
| 4 | Nicotinic acid | C6H5NO2 | 124.039 | [M+H] | 87096072.94 | Alkaloid |
| 5 | Palmatine | C21H22NO4 | 352.153 | [M]+ | 1414855.134 | Alkaloid |
| 6 | Allocryptopine | C21H23NO5 | 370.165 | [M+H] | 20554792.16 | Alkaloid |
| 7 | Acetophenone | C8H8O | 121.064 | [M+H] | 4027023.846 | Phenols |
| 8 | Boldine | C19H21NO4 | 328.153 | [M+H]+ | 4970057868 | Alkaloid |
| 9 | Camphor | C10H16O | 153.127 | [M+H] | 1193613.001 | Terpenoids |
| 10 | Linderane | C15H16O4 | 261.111 | [M+H] | 103593915.9 | Terpenoids |
| 11 | Apigenin | C15H10O5 | 269.045 | [M-H]- | 2469278.777 | Flavonoids |
| 12 | Kaempferol | C15H10O6 | 285.042 | [M-H]- | 3370501.518 | Flavonoids |
| 13 | Azelaic acid | C9H16O4 | 187.097 | [M-H]- | 6112865.346 | Aliphatic acyl |
| 14 | Naringenin | C15H12O5 | 271.060 | [M-H] | 7626711.301 | Flavonoids |
| 15 | isoimperatorin | C16H14O4 | 269.082 | [M-H]- | 11272505.7 | Phenylpropanoids |
| 16 | Coumaric acid | C9H8O3 | 163.039 | [M-H]- | 12214940.45 | Phenylpropanoids |
| 17 | Caffeic acid | C9H8O4 | 179.034 | [M-H]- | 42289183.19 | Phenylpropanoids |
| 18 | cirsimaritin | C17H14O6 | 313.071 | [M-H]- | 55540661.17 | Flavonoids |
| 19 | Vanillic acid | C8H8O4 | 167.034 | [M-H]- | 67417507.56 | Cinnamic acid derivatives |
| 20 | Quercetin | C15H10O7 | 301.037 | [M-H]- | 3860556.051 | Flavonoids |
Figure 2 XSD inhibits angiogenesis by modulating VEGF and MMP9 secretion in vitro A: VEGF levels in ESC supernatants after 24 h of treatment; B: MMP9 levels in ESC supernatants after 24 h of treatment; C: C1-C7: tube formation assays of HUVECs treated with conditioned media from each group (× 40); C8-C14: representative images of endothelial tube formation analyzed by AngioTool; D: migration assays of HUVECs treated with conditioned media (× 100); E: invasion assays of HUVECs treated with conditioned media (× 100). C1, C8, D1, E1: Control group; C2, C9, D2, E2: E2 group; C3, C10, D3, E3: Vehicle group; C4, C11, D4, E4: Low dose XSD group; C5, C12, D5, E5: Middle dose XSD group; C6, C13, D6, E6: High dose XSD group; C7, C14, D7, E7: Mifepristone group. Control: ESCs treated with 200 μM CoCl2. E2: ESCs treated with 10 nM E2. Vehicle: ESCs treated with blank. XSD-L: ESCs treated with 2.5% (v/v) XSD-containing serum. XSD-M: ESCs treated with 5% (v/v) XSD-containing serum. XSD-H: ESCs treated with 10% (v/v) XSD-containing serum. Mifepristone: ESCs treated with 10 μM mifepristone. VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; MMP9: matrix metalloproteinase-9; ESCs: endometrial stromal cells; E2: Estrogen; XSD: Xuandan Sanjie decoction; ANOVA: analysis of variance. ANOVA tests were used among these groups. Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Compared with the Control group, aP < 0.05; compared with the Vehicle group, bP > 0.05, cP < 0.05, dP < 0.01.
Figure 3 XSD regulates VEGF and MMP9 expression via ESR1/GPER-HIF-1α pathways A: qPCR analysis of HIF-1α mRNA in ESCs after 24 h; B: qPCR analysis of VEGF mRNA after 24 h; C: Western blot of ESR1 and HIF-1α at 24 h; D: VEGF levels in ESC supernatants (24 h); E: early (1 h) expression of HIF-1α mRNA; F: early (1 h) expression of VEGF mRNA; G: Western blot of GPER and HIF-1α at 1 h post-stimulation; H: VEGF secretion after 1 h assessed by ELISA. Group definitions: Control: 200 μM CoCl2; E2: 10 nM E2 under hypoxia; Vehicle: blank serum under hypoxia + E2; XSD: 10% (v/v) XSD serum under hypoxia + E2; Giredestrant: 10 nM Giredestrant under hypoxia + E2; G15: 100 nM G15 under hypoxia + E2. qPCR: quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; ESCs: endometrial stromal cells; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; MMP9: matrix metalloproteinase-9; CoCl2: cobalt (II) chloride; ESR1: estrogen receptor 1; HIF-1α: hypoxia inducible factor-1α; ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; GPER: G protein-coupled estrogen receptor; PI3K: phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; p-PI3K: phospho-PI3K; AKT: protein kinase B; p-AKT: phospho-AKT; ERK: extracellular signal-regulated kinase; p-ERK: phospho-ERK; XSD: Xuandan Sanjie decoction; ANOVA: analysis of variance. ANOVA tests were used among these groups. Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Compared with the Control group, aP < 0.05; compared with the Vehicle group, bP < 0.05; compared with the XSD group, cP > 0.05.
Figure 4 XSD inhibits angiogenesis in vivo in AM through ESR1/GPER-HIF-1α signaling A: VEGF levels in ectopic lesions from all groups (ELISA); B: MMP9 levels in ectopic lesions from all groups (ELISA); C: uterus index comparison; D: number of AM nodules; E: HE staining of uterine tissues (× 10); F: pathology scoring; G: immunohistochemistry staining of GPER, ESR1, HIF-1α, and CD31 (× 200); E1, G1, G7, G13, G19: Control group; E2, G2, G8, G14, G20: Model group; E3, G3, G9, G15, G21: Vehicle group; E4, G4, G10, G16, G22: Positive group; E5, G5, G11, G17, G23: XSD-L group; E6, G6, G12, G18, G24: XSD-H group. H: H-score quantification of GPER. I: H-score quantification of ESR1. J: H-score quantification of HIF-1α. Group definitions: Control: untreated mice; Model: saline (0.2 mL/d); Vehicle: distilled water (0.2 mL/d); Positive control (Mifepristone): 3.25 mg/kg bw; XSD-L: low dose (5.2 g/kg bw) XSD; XSD-H: high dose (10.4 g/kg bw) XSD. ESR1: estrogen receptor 1; GPER: G protein-coupled estrogen receptor; HIF-1α: hypoxia inducible factor-1α; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; MMP9: matrix metalloproteinase-9; HE: hematoxylin and eosin; ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; AM: adenomyosis; XSD: Xuandan Sanjie decoction; ANOVA: analysis of variance. Statistical analysis was carried out using ANOVA tests among these groups. Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 8). Compared with the Control group, aP < 0.05; compared with the Model group, bP > 0.05, cP < 0.01, dP < 0.05.
| [1] | Habiba M, Guo SW, Benagiano G. Adenomyosis and abnormal uterine bleeding: review of the evidence. Biomolecules 2024; 14: 616. |
| [2] | Li B, Shi K, Jing C, Xu L, Kong M, Ba M. Successful management of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis due to adenomyosis: case reports and literature review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2023; 229: 107726. |
| [3] | Moldassarina RS. Modern view on the diagnostics and treatment of adenomyosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2023; 308: 171-81. |
| [4] | Fan Y, Zhu S, Liang X. Conservative surgical and drug therapies for adenomyosis medicine. Reprod Biol 2022; 22: 100664. |
| [5] | Harmsen MJ, Wong CFC, Mijatovic V, et al. Role of angiogenesis in adenomyosis-associated abnormal uterine bleeding and subfertility: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2019; 25: 646-70. |
| [6] | Harmsen MJ, Juffermans LJM, Kroon MO, Griffioen AW, Huirne JAF. Anti-angiogenic therapy as potential treatment for adenomyosis. Angiogenesis 2025; 28: 12. |
| [7] | Zhong S, Qian L, Tan Y. Xue Ping Tablets treat abnormal uterine bleeding via VEGF-ERK1/2 pathway. Heliyon 2024; 10: e30079. |
| [8] | Ru J, Li P, Wang J, et al. TCMSP: a database of systems pharmacology for drug discovery from herbal medicines. J Cheminform 2014; 6: 13. |
| [9] | Szklarczyk D, Gable AL, Nastou KC, et al. The STRING database in 2021:customizable protein-protein networks, and functional characterization of user-uploaded gene/measurement sets. Nucleic Acids Res 2020; 49: D605-12. |
| [10] | Zhang H, Zhou C, Zhang Z, et al. Integration of network pharmacology and experimental validation to explore the pharmacological mechanisms of Zhuanggu Busui formula against osteoporosis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 12: 841668. |
| [11] | Gan L, Li Y, Chen Y, et al. Transcriptome analysis of eutopic endometrial stromal cells in women with adenomyosis by RNA-sequencing. Bioengineered 2022; 13: 12637-49. |
| [12] | Zhang YB, Wang X, Meister E, et al. The effects of CoCl2 on HIF-1α protein under experimental conditions of autoprogressive hypoxia using mouse models. Int J Mol Sci 2014; 15: 10999-1012. |
| [13] | Di Mattia M, Mauro A, Delle Monache S, et al. Hypoxia-mimetic CoCl2 agent enhances pro-angiogenic activities in ovine amniotic epithelial cells-derived conditioned medium. Cells 2022; 11: 461. |
| [14] | Muñoz-Sánchez J, Chánez-Cárdenas ME. The use of cobalt chloride as a chemical hypoxia model. J Appl Toxicol 2018; 39: 556-70. |
| [15] | Ye Q, Zhang J, Zhang C, et al. Endothelial PRMT5 plays a crucial role in angiogenesis after acute ischemic injury. JCI Insight 2022; 7: e152481. |
| [16] | Huang X, Pan Q, Mao Z, et al. Kaempferol inhibits interleukin-1β stimulated matrix metalloproteinases by suppressing the MAPK-associated ERK and P38 signaling pathways. Mol Med Rep 2018; 18: 2697-704. |
| [17] | Zhang J, Li H, Wang W, Li H. Assessing the anti-inflammatory effects of quercetin using network pharmacology and in vitro experiments. Exp Ther Med 2022; 23: 301. |
| [18] | Guo S, Zhang D, Lu X, et al. Hypoxia and its possible relationship with endometrial receptivity in adenomyosis: a preliminary study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2021; 19: 7. |
| [19] | Li B, Zhang Q, Sun J, Lai D. Human amniotic epithelial cells improve fertility in an intrauterine adhesion mouse model. Stem Cell Res Ther 2019; 10: 257. |
| [20] | Zhou S, Yi T, Liu R, et al. Proteomics identification of annexin A2 as a key mediator in the metastasis and proangiogenesis of endometrial cells in human adenomyosis. Mol Cell Proteomics 2012; 11: M112.017988. |
| [21] | Gui T, Liu M, Yao B, et al. TCF3 is epigenetically silenced by EZH2 and DNMT3B and functions as a tumor suppressor in endometrial cancer. Cell Death Differ 2021; 28: 3316-28. |
| [22] | Wang X, Xia X, Xu E, et al. Estrogen receptor beta prevents signet ring cell gastric carcinoma progression in young patients by inhibiting pseudopodia formation via the mTOR-Arpc1b/EVL signaling pathway. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021; 8: 592919. |
| [23] | Ahmed S, Grant KG, Edwards LE, et al. Data-driven modeling reconciles kinetics of ERK phosphorylation, localization, and activity states. Molecular Systems Biology 2014; 10: 718. |
| [24] | Filippi I, Carrarelli P, Luisi S, et al. Different expression of hypoxic and angiogenic factors in human endometriotic lesions. Reprod Sci 2016; 23: 492-7. |
| [25] | Hsiao KY, Lin SC, Wu MH, Tsai SJ. Pathological functions of hypoxia in endometriosis. Front Biosci (Elite Ed) 2015; 7: 309-21. |
| [26] | Tirpe AA, Gulei D, Ciortea SM, Crivii C, Berindan-Neagoe I. Hypoxia: overview on hypoxia-mediated mechanisms with a focus on the role of HIF genes. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20: 6140. |
| [27] | Khater M, Greco F, Osborn HMI. Antiangiogenic activity of flavonoids: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Molecules 2020; 25: 4712. |
| [28] | Ghosh R, Bhowmik A, Biswas S, et al. Natural flavonoid Orientin restricts 5-Fluorouracil induced cancer stem cells mediated angiogenesis by regulating HIF1α and VEGFA in colorectal cancer. Mol Med 2025; 31: 85. |
| [29] | Kong C, Jeong C, Choi J, Kim K, Jeong J. Antiangiogenic effects of p-coumaric acid in human endothelial cells. Phytother Res 2012; 27: 317-23. |
| [30] | Zhou J, Xie X, Tang H, Peng C, Peng F. The bioactivities of sclareol: a mini review. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13: 1014105. |
| [31] | Akhigbe RE, Afolabi OA, Adegbola CA, Akhigbe TM, Oyedokun PA, Afolabi OA. Comparison of the effectiveness of levonorgestrel intrauterine system and dienogest in the management of adenomyosis: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2024; 300: 230-9. |
| [32] | Kamba T, McDonald DM. Mechanisms of adverse effects of anti-VEGF therapy for cancer. Br J Cancer 2007; 96: 1788-95. |
| [33] | Wang L, Fei Y, Qu H, et al. Five years of safety profile of bevacizumab: an analysis of real-world pharmacovigilance and randomized clinical trials. J Pharm Health Care Sci 2024; 10: 1. |
| [34] | Moawad G, Youssef Y, Fruscalzo A, et al. The present and the future of medical therapies for adenomyosis: a narrative review. J Clin Med 2023; 12: 6130. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
Sponsored by China Association of Chinese Medicine
& China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
16 Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimen Nei, Beijing, China. 100700 Email: jtcmen@126.com
Copyright 2020 Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine. All rights reserved.
