Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (06): 735-745.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Safety and effectiveness of Traditional Chinese Medicinal herbs for diabetic foot: a systematic review and Meta-analysis

Chen Shuo, Ma Jianwei, Xu Limei, Niu Tianhui, Dong Jing, Liu Wenjun, Han Qi   

  1. Beijing Drum Tower Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine;Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine General Hospital of the Air Force PLA;Department of Dalian Medical University;
  • Accepted:2017-12-15 Online:2017-12-15 Published:2022-04-04
  • Supported by:
    Supported by Capital Characteristic Clinical Application Research Subject:the Clinical Study of Comprehensive Therapy of Traditional Chinese Medicine Combine and Western Medicine to Improve the Efficacy of the Early to Mid-term Diabetic Foot(No.Z121107001012011)

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of traditional Chinese medicinal herbs(TCMHs) as an adjunctive treatment for diabetic foot(DF).METHODS: The sources used were Pub Med(1966 to August 2015), the Cochrane Library(1988 to August 2015), the Excerpta Medica Database(1974 to August 2015), Wiley(1807 to August 2015), Ovid(1988 to August 2015), Clinical Trials.gov(1993 to August 2015), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials(1966 to August 2015), China Science and Technology Journal Database(1994 to August2015), Chi CTR(2007 to August 2015), Sino Med(1978 to August 2015), the China National Knowledge Infrastructure(1984 to August 2015), Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform(1998 to August 2015), and the Traditional Chinese Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System(TCMLARS)(1984 to August 2015). Studies were identified and selected, and the data were extracted by two independent reviewers. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess the quality of studies. Revman 5.2 software was used for data synthesis and analysis.RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included based on the selection criteria. Of these, seven studies had low bias risk and one had high bias risk. In the overall analysis, TCMHs resulted in a significantly higher total effective rate(OR 5.08; 95% CI 3.50 to7.36; P < 0.000 01), cure rate(OR 2.12; 95% CI1.63 to 2.77; P < 0.000 01), and shorter time to ulcer healing(SMD-0.64; 95% CI-0.89 to-0.40;P < 0.000 01) when compared with non-TCMHs treated DF. The analysis also revealed that significantly fewer amputations occurred in TCMHs patients(OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.20 to 0.65; P = 0.0007).Sensitivity analysis indicated that the findings of the Meta-analysis were robust to study quality,and the funnel plot of the Egger test showed no publication bias.CONCLUSION: TCMHs intervention appears to be more effective for DF, with a similar safety profile,when compared with non-TCMHs treatments, although this result requires further verification with more well-designed studies.

Key words: Diabetic foot, Medicine,Chinese Traditional, Randomized controlled trial, Meta-analysis

Cite this article

Chen Shuo, Ma Jianwei, Xu Limei, Niu Tianhui, Dong Jing, Liu Wenjun, Han Qi. Safety and effectiveness of Traditional Chinese Medicinal herbs for diabetic foot: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2017, 37(06): 735-745.