Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 528-537.DOI: 10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.2025.03.009
Previous Articles Next Articles
CHEN Yuanchun1(
), JING Jiaxing1(
), LI Qingmin2, ZHOU Xiaohong3, JIN Xiaofei4, GAO Weijuan5,6, CHEN Xiangmei7,8,9(
), YU Wentao10,11,12(
)
Received:2024-04-22
Accepted:2024-08-29
Online:2025-06-15
Published:2025-05-21
Contact:
Prof. YU Wentao, College of Acupuncture and Massage, Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang 050200, China. Supported by:CHEN Yuanchun, JING Jiaxing, LI Qingmin, ZHOU Xiaohong, JIN Xiaofei, GAO Weijuan, CHEN Xiangmei, YU Wentao. Exploring the mechanism of Shenhua tablet (肾华片) alleviating renal injury by regulating macrophage glycolysis via hypoxia-inducible factor-1α/ pyruvate kinase M2 signaling pathway in diabetic kidney disease mice[J]. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2025, 45(3): 528-537.
| Group | n | Dose (g/kg) | FBG (mmol/L) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12W | 14W | 16W | 18W | 20W | |||
| Control | 6 | - | 9.9±1.4 | 11.3±1.3 | 11.1±1.6 | 10.4±0.8 | 10.6±0.7 |
| Model | 6 | - | 25.3±4.6a | 28.0±4.1a | 27.9±3.6a | 29.8±3.2a | 30.9±2.1a |
| DAPA | 6 | 0.001 | 26.0±5.1a | 15.0±1.1b | 12.2±2.1b | 12.0±2.0b | 12.1±1.6b |
| SHT-H | 6 | 1.8 | 25.7±4.0a | 25.7±5.3 | 25.8±2.9 | 25.7±1.4b | 24.2±1.3b |
| SHT-M | 6 | 0.9 | 25.1±3.7a | 27.1±3.4 | 26.8±2.8 | 27.5±2.9 | 28.3±2.5c |
| SHT-L | 6 | 0.45 | 25.5±4.2a | 27.9±3.3 | 27.3±3.4 | 29.3±3.7 | 29.7±2.1 |
Table 1 Effects of SHT on FBG of DKD mice ($\bar{x}±s$)
| Group | n | Dose (g/kg) | FBG (mmol/L) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12W | 14W | 16W | 18W | 20W | |||
| Control | 6 | - | 9.9±1.4 | 11.3±1.3 | 11.1±1.6 | 10.4±0.8 | 10.6±0.7 |
| Model | 6 | - | 25.3±4.6a | 28.0±4.1a | 27.9±3.6a | 29.8±3.2a | 30.9±2.1a |
| DAPA | 6 | 0.001 | 26.0±5.1a | 15.0±1.1b | 12.2±2.1b | 12.0±2.0b | 12.1±1.6b |
| SHT-H | 6 | 1.8 | 25.7±4.0a | 25.7±5.3 | 25.8±2.9 | 25.7±1.4b | 24.2±1.3b |
| SHT-M | 6 | 0.9 | 25.1±3.7a | 27.1±3.4 | 26.8±2.8 | 27.5±2.9 | 28.3±2.5c |
| SHT-L | 6 | 0.45 | 25.5±4.2a | 27.9±3.3 | 27.3±3.4 | 29.3±3.7 | 29.7±2.1 |
| Group | n | Dose (g/kg) | 24 h-UTP (mg) | UACR (mg/mmol) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 W | 20 W | 12 W | 20 W | ||||
| Control | 6 | - | 0.30±0.05 | 1.29±0.14 | 72.21±9.36 | 85.22±10.56 | |
| Model | 6 | - | 1.20±0.19a | 8.52±0.63a | 120.41±12.59a | 614.41±30.54a | |
| DAPA | 6 | 0.001 | 1.26±0.22a | 6.58±0.78b | 114.88±9.15a | 374.44±40.36b | |
| SHT-H | 6 | 1.8 | 1.30±0.22a | 7.29±0.46b | 122.21±21.86a | 404.96±17.69b | |
| SHT-M | 6 | 0.9 | 1.25±0.17a | 7.62±0.65b | 120.76±20.12a | 415.87±26.27b | |
| SHT-L | 6 | 0.45 | 1.22±0.20a | 7.79±0.47c | 113.59±12.50a | 465.87±35.59b | |
Table 2 Effects of SHT on 24 h-UTP and UACR of DKD mice ($\bar{x}±s$)
| Group | n | Dose (g/kg) | 24 h-UTP (mg) | UACR (mg/mmol) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 W | 20 W | 12 W | 20 W | ||||
| Control | 6 | - | 0.30±0.05 | 1.29±0.14 | 72.21±9.36 | 85.22±10.56 | |
| Model | 6 | - | 1.20±0.19a | 8.52±0.63a | 120.41±12.59a | 614.41±30.54a | |
| DAPA | 6 | 0.001 | 1.26±0.22a | 6.58±0.78b | 114.88±9.15a | 374.44±40.36b | |
| SHT-H | 6 | 1.8 | 1.30±0.22a | 7.29±0.46b | 122.21±21.86a | 404.96±17.69b | |
| SHT-M | 6 | 0.9 | 1.25±0.17a | 7.62±0.65b | 120.76±20.12a | 415.87±26.27b | |
| SHT-L | 6 | 0.45 | 1.22±0.20a | 7.79±0.47c | 113.59±12.50a | 465.87±35.59b | |
Figure 1 SHT attenuated renal injury in DKD mice A: HE staining of kidney tissue (× 200, scale bar = 100 μm, n = 3); A1: Control group; A2: Model group; A3: DAPA group; A4: SHT-H group; A5: SHT-M group; A6: SHT-L group. B: PAS staining of kidney tissue (× 200, scale bar = 100 μm, n = 3); B1: Control group; B2: Model group; B3: DAPA group; B4: SHT-H group; B5: SHT-M group; B6: SHT-L group. In HE staining, black arrows indicate loose and light-stained cytoplasm, blue arrows indicate lymphocyte infiltration, and red arrows indicate renal tubular necrosis. In PAS staining, black arrows indicate an increased mesangial matrix. DAPA group (dapagliflozin oral administration, 1 mg/kg per day, 8 weeks), SHT-L group (SHT oral administration, 0.45 g/kg per day, 8 weeks), SHT-M group (SHT oral administration, 0.9 g/kg per day, 8 weeks), and SHT-H group (SHT oral administration, 1.8 g/kg per day, 8 weeks), control and model groups were given normal saline (0.1 mL/10 g per day, 8 weeks). SHT: Shenhua tablet; DKD: diabetic kidney disease; HE: hematoxylin-eosin; DAPA: dapagliflozin; SHT-H: Shenhua tablet high-dose; SHT-M: Shenhua tablet medium-dose; SHT-L: Shenhua tablet low-dose; PAS: periodic acid Schiff’s.
| Group | n | Dose (g/kg) | BUN (mmol/L) | Scr (μmol/L) | UA (μmol/L) | β2-MG (μg/L) | Cys C (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 6 | - | 5.75±0.40 | 16.09±0.95 | 119.78±11.49 | 79.97±4.84 | 2.25±0.12 |
| Model | 6 | - | 10.15±0.60a | 36.62±2.17a | 231.82±16.17a | 148.07±7.93a | 3.10±0.32a |
| DAPA | 6 | 0.001 | 6.78±0.76b | 21.93±1.48b | 189.81±13.76b | 107.05±9.13b | 2.58±0.23b |
| SHT-H | 6 | 1.8 | 8.00±0.48b | 25.84±1.42b | 195.48±16.06b | 117.86±7.65b | 2.64±0.20b |
| SHT-M | 6 | 0.9 | 8.51±0.64b | 32.64±2.11b | 209.70±8.14b | 127.49±10.39b | 2.67±0.23b |
| SHT-L | 6 | 0.45 | 9.36±0.37c | 34.21±1.56c | 215.66±6.96c | 135.90±9.97c | 2.78±0.19c |
Table 3 Effects of SHT on BUN, UA, Scr, Cys C, and β2-MG in the serum of DKD mice ($\bar{x}±s$)
| Group | n | Dose (g/kg) | BUN (mmol/L) | Scr (μmol/L) | UA (μmol/L) | β2-MG (μg/L) | Cys C (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 6 | - | 5.75±0.40 | 16.09±0.95 | 119.78±11.49 | 79.97±4.84 | 2.25±0.12 |
| Model | 6 | - | 10.15±0.60a | 36.62±2.17a | 231.82±16.17a | 148.07±7.93a | 3.10±0.32a |
| DAPA | 6 | 0.001 | 6.78±0.76b | 21.93±1.48b | 189.81±13.76b | 107.05±9.13b | 2.58±0.23b |
| SHT-H | 6 | 1.8 | 8.00±0.48b | 25.84±1.42b | 195.48±16.06b | 117.86±7.65b | 2.64±0.20b |
| SHT-M | 6 | 0.9 | 8.51±0.64b | 32.64±2.11b | 209.70±8.14b | 127.49±10.39b | 2.67±0.23b |
| SHT-L | 6 | 0.45 | 9.36±0.37c | 34.21±1.56c | 215.66±6.96c | 135.90±9.97c | 2.78±0.19c |
Figure 2 SHT inhibits macrophage polarization toward the M1 type A: expression of M1 macrophage marker (CD86, green) was examined by immunofluorescence staining, and nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue) (× 400, scale bar = 20 μm, n = 3); A1-A3: Control group; A4-A6: Model group; A7-A9: DAPA group; A10-A12: SHT-H group; A13-A15: SHT-M group; A16-A18: SHT-L group; B: expression of M2 macrophage marker (CD206, green) was examined by immunofluorescence staining, and nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue) (× 400, scale bar = 20 μm, n = 3); B1-B3: control group; B4-B6: model group; B7-B9: DAPA group; B10-B12: SHT-H group; B13-B15: SHT-M group; B16-B18: SHT-L group; C: relative fluorescence intensity of CD86 was determined using ImageJ software; D: relative fluorescence intensity of CD206 was determined using ImageJ software. DAPA group (dapagliflozin oral administration, 1 mg/kg per day, 8 weeks), SHT-L group (SHT oral administration, 0.45 g/kg per day, 8 weeks), SHT-M group (SHT oral administration, 0.9 g/kg per day, 8 weeks), and SHT-H group (SHT oral administration, 1.8 g/kg per day, 8 weeks), control and model groups were given normal saline (0.1 mL/10 g per day, 8 weeks). SHT: Shenhua tablet; DAPI: 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; DAPA: dapagliflozin; SHT-H: Shenhua tablet high-dose; SHT-M: Shenhua tablet medium-dose; SHT-L: Shenhua tablet low-dose. Statistical analyses were measured using a one-way analysis of variance for multiple comparisons. Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation. aP < 0.01 vs control group; bP < 0.01, cP < 0.05 vs model group.
| Group | n | Dose (g/kg) | TNF-α (pg/mL) | IL-1β (pg/mL) | IL-6 (pg/mL) | MCP-1 (pg/mL) | IL-10 (pg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 6 | - | 32±6 | 30±5 | 71±6 | 844±71 | 458±35 |
| Model | 6 | - | 111±4a | 58±6a | 202±13a | 2068±181a | 118±11a |
| DAPA | 6 | 0.001 | 73±4b | 43±5b | 170±11b | 1419±111b | 311±24b |
| SHT-H | 6 | 1.8 | 92±8b | 48±4b | 176±8b | 1318±193b | 288±23b |
| SHT-M | 6 | 0.9 | 96±9b | 49±5b | 178±9b | 1546±181b | 219±23b |
| SHT-L | 6 | 0.45 | 97±9b | 52±5c | 182±13 b | 1674±122b | 160±15b |
Table 4 Effects of SHT on the levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, MCP-1, and IL-10 in kidney tissue of DKD mice ($\bar{x}±s$)
| Group | n | Dose (g/kg) | TNF-α (pg/mL) | IL-1β (pg/mL) | IL-6 (pg/mL) | MCP-1 (pg/mL) | IL-10 (pg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 6 | - | 32±6 | 30±5 | 71±6 | 844±71 | 458±35 |
| Model | 6 | - | 111±4a | 58±6a | 202±13a | 2068±181a | 118±11a |
| DAPA | 6 | 0.001 | 73±4b | 43±5b | 170±11b | 1419±111b | 311±24b |
| SHT-H | 6 | 1.8 | 92±8b | 48±4b | 176±8b | 1318±193b | 288±23b |
| SHT-M | 6 | 0.9 | 96±9b | 49±5b | 178±9b | 1546±181b | 219±23b |
| SHT-L | 6 | 0.45 | 97±9b | 52±5c | 182±13 b | 1674±122b | 160±15b |
Figure 3 Effect of SHT on regulating glycolysis in macrophages A: expression of HK1 in macrophages was observed by staining the glycolysis rate-limiting enzyme HK1 (green) and the macrophage marker F4/80 (red) with two-color immunofluorescence, and nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue), (× 400, scale bar = 20 μm, n = 3); A1-A4: control group; A5-A8: model group; A9-A12: DAPA group; A13-A16: SHT-H group; A17-A20: SHT-M group; A21-A24: SHT-L group. B: expression of LDHA in macrophages was observed by staining LDHA (green) and the macrophage marker F4/80 (red) with two-color immunofluorescence, and nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue), (× 400, scale bar, 20 μm, n = 3); B1-B4: control group; B5-B8: model group; B9-B12: DAPA group; B13-B16: SHT-H group; B17-B20: SHT-M group; B21-B24: SHT-L group. The last column of the composite picture shows a magnified view of a section of the merge picture. DAPA group (dapagliflozin oral administration, 1 mg/kg per day, 8 weeks), SHT-L group (SHT oral administration, 0.45 g/kg per day, 8 weeks), SHT-M group (SHT oral administration, 0.9 g/kg per day, 8 weeks), and SHT-H group (SHT oral administration, 1.8 g/kg per day, 8 weeks), Control and Model groups were given normal saline (0.1 mL/10 g per day, 8 weeks). SHT: Shenhua tablet; HK1: hexokinase 1; DAPI: 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; DAPA: dapagliflozin; SHT-H: Shenhua tablet high-dose; SHT-M: Shenhua tablet medium-dose; SHT-L: Shenhua tablet low-dose; LDHA: lactate dehydrogenase A.
Figure 4 Regulatory effect of SHT on the HIF-1α/PKM2 signaling pathway in macrophages A: expression of HIF-1α in macrophages was observed by staining HIF-1α (green) and the macrophage marker F4/80 (red) using two-color immunofluorescence, with nuclei stained using DAPI (blue), (× 400, scale bar = 20 μm, n = 3); A1-A4: control group; A5-A8: model group; A9-A12: DAPA group; A13-A16: SHT-H group; A17-A20: SHT-M group; A21-A24: SHT-L group. B: expression of PKM2 in macrophages was observed by staining PKM2 (green) and the macrophage marker F4/80 (red) using two-color immunofluorescence, with nuclei stained using DAPI (blue), (× 400, scale bar = 20 μm, n = 3); B1-B4: control group; B5-B8: model group; B9-B12: DAPA group; B13-B16: SHT-H group; B17-B20: SHT-M group; B21-B24: SHT-L group. The last column of the composite picture shows a magnified view of a section of the merge picture. DAPA group (dapagliflozin oral administration, 1 mg/kg per day, 8 weeks), SHT-L group (SHT oral administration, 0.45 g/kg per day, 8 weeks), SHT-M group (SHT oral administration, 0.9 g/kg per day, 8 weeks), and SHT-H group (SHT oral administration, 1.8 g/kg per day, 8 weeks), control and model groups were given normal saline (0.1 mL/10 g per day, 8 weeks). SHT: Shenhua tablet; HIF-1α:hypoxia-inducible factor-1α; PKM2: pyruvate kinase M2; DAPI: 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; DAPA: dapagliflozin; SHT-H: Shenhua tablet high-dose; SHT-M: Shenhua tablet medium-dose; SHT-L: Shenhua tablet low-dose.
| 1. | Yao L, Liang X, Qiao Y, Chen BH, Wang P, Liu ZS. Mitochondrial dysfunction in diabetic tubulopathy. Metabolism 2022; 131: 155195. |
| 2. | Sinha SK, Nicholas SB. Pathomechanisms of diabetic kidney disease. J Clin Med 2023; 12: 7349. |
| 3. | Kong LY, Andrikopoulos S, Macisaac RJ, et al. Role of the adaptive immune system in diabetic kidney disease. J Diabetes Investig 2022; 13: 213-26. |
| 4. |
Liu Y, Xu RY, Gu HY, et al. Metabolic reprogramming in macrophage responses. Biomark Res 2021; 9: 1.
DOI PMID |
| 5. | Wang MD, Pang YY, Guo YF, et al. Metabolic reprogramming: a novel therapeutic target in diabetic kidney disease. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13: 970601. |
| 6. | Zhang XL, Li RK, Gao T, et al. Mechanism of ultrafiltration extract of angelicae sinensis radix and hedysari radix regulates HIF-1α signaling pathway mediated by renal hypoxia to ameliorate renal fibrosis in DKD rats. Zhong Guo Zhong Yao Za Zhi 2024; 49: 1602-10. |
| 7. | Li X, Ma TK, Wang M, et al. YY1-induced upregulation of LncRNA-ARAP1-AS2 and ARAP1 promotes diabetic kidney fibrosis via aberrant glycolysis associated with EGFR/PKM2/ HIF-1α pathway. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14: 1069348. |
| 8. |
Mouton AJ, Li X, Hall ME, Hall JE. Obesity, hypertension, and cardiac dysfunction: novel roles of immunometabolism in macro-phage activation and inflammation. Circ Res 2020; 126: 789-806.
DOI PMID |
| 9. | Chen XM, Chen J, Chen YP, et al. Multicentered randomized controlled clinical trial on patients with IgA nephropathy of Qi-Yin deficiency syndrome type. Zhong Guo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi 2007; 27: 101-5. |
| 10. | Geng WJ, Wei RB, Mao W, Liu XS, Shi SZ. Protective effects of compound Shenhua tablet on diabetic nephropathy rats. Zhong Guo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi 2012; 32: 352-5. |
| 11. | Li R, Shi CR, Wei CT, et al. Fufang Shenhua tablet inhibits renal fibrosis by inhibiting PI3K/AKT. Phytomedicine 2023; 116: 154873. |
| 12. | Li JJ, Chen XM, Gu Y, et al. Effect of compound Shenhua tablet on macrophage migration inhibition factor in renal tissue of 5/6 nephrectomized rats. Zhong Guo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi 2005; 25: 150-3. |
| 13. | Chen ZJ, Liu LJ, Gao CF, et al. Astragali Radix (Huangqi): a promising edible immunomodulatory herbal medicine. J Ethnopharmacol 2020; 258: 112895. |
| 14. | Li R, Shi CR, Wei CT, et al. Fufang shenhua tablet, Astragali Radix and its active component astragaloside IV: research progress on anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory mechanisms in the kidney. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14: 1131635. |
| 15. | Chen DQ, Wu J, Li P. Therapeutic mechanism and clinical application of Chinese herbal medicine against diabetic kidney disease. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13: 1055296. |
| 16. |
Yang Y, Wei RB, Zheng XY, et al. Effects of compound Shenhua tablet on renal tubular Na-+-K-+-ATPase in rats with acute ischemic reperfusion injury. Chin J Integr Med 2014; 20: 200-8.
DOI PMID |
| 17. | He JY, Peng F, Chang JK, et al. The therapeutic effect of Shenhua tablet against mesangial cell proliferation and renal inflammation in mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis. Biomed Pharmacother 2023; 165: 115233. |
| 18. | Cai A, Shen J, Yang X, et al. Dapagliflozin alleviates renal inflammation and protects against diabetic kidney diseases, both dependent and independent of blood glucose levels. Front Immunol 2023; 14: 1205834. |
| 19. | Jin SQ, Song Y, Zhou L, et al. Depletion of CUL4B in macrophages ameliorates diabetic kidney disease via miR-194-5p/ITGA9 axis. Cell Rep 2023; 42: 112550. |
| 20. | Qu DD, Lu J, Bi Y. Research progress of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Yi Xue Zong Shu 2021; 27: 3896-900. |
| 21. | Li HQ, Liu N, Zheng ZY, Teng HL, Pei J. Clopidogrel delays and can reverse diabetic nephropathy pathogenesis in type 2 diabetic db/db mice. World J Diabetes 2022; 13: 600-12. |
| 22. | Gu CJ, Geng XW, Wu YC, et al. Engineered macrophage membrane-coated nanoparticles with enhanced CCR2 expression promote spinal cord injury repair by suppressing neuroinflammation and neuronal death. Small 2024; 20: e2305659. |
| 23. | Fang XH, Li ZJ, Liu CY, Mor G, Liao AH. Macrophage memory: types, mechanisms, and its role in health and disease. Immunology 2024; 171: 18-30. |
| 24. |
Funes SC, Rios M, Escobar-Vera J, Kalergis AM. Implications of macrophage polarization in autoimmunity. Immunology 2018; 154: 186-95.
DOI PMID |
| 25. | Youssef N, Noureldein MH, Riachi ME, Haddad A, Eid AA. Macrophage polarization and signaling in diabetic kidney disease: a catalyst for disease progression. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2024; 326: F301-12. |
| 26. | Zhang XL, Zhao Y, Zhu XD, et al. Active vitamin D regulates macrophage M1/M2 phenotypes via the STAT-1-TREM-1 pathway in diabetic nephropathy. J Cell Physiol 2019; 234: 6917-26. |
| 27. | Kolliniati O, Ieronymaki E, Vergadi E, Tsatsanis C. Metabolic regulation of macrophage activation. J Innate Immun 2022; 14: 51-68. |
| 28. | Wu HN, Lin CL, Huang CH. Research progress of glucose metabolism reprogramming in macrophage polarization. Zhong Guo Bing Li Sheng Li Za Zhi 2023; 39: 1650-7. |
| 29. | Liu J, Nie Y, Wang YY, Lian H. Research progress on macrophage metabolism and tissue repair. Xian Dai Mian Yi Xue 2022; 42: 248-53. |
| 30. | Wei XJ, Hou Y, Long MT, Jiang L, Du Y. Advances in energy metabolism in renal fibrosis. Life Sci 2023; 312: 121033. |
| 31. | Shirai T, Nazarewicz RR, Wallis BB, et al. The glycolytic enzyme PKM2 bridges metabolic and inflammatory dysfunction in coronary artery disease. J Exp Med 2016; 213:337-54. |
| 32. | Yang ZH, Wang BK, Li D, Gao S. Advances in energy metabolism and polarization of macrophages in myocardial infarction. Zhong Guo Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi 2023; 39: 2111-4. |
| 33. | Marrocco A, Ortiz LA. Role of metabolic reprogramming in pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion from LPS or silica-activated macrophages. Front Immunol 2022; 13: 936167. |
| 34. | Zhang BC, Zhang TT, Xiang CH, Liu YW. Luteolin regulates M1 macrophage polarization by inhibiting glycolytic pathway induced by HIF-α. Zhong Guo Yao Li Xue Tong Bao 2023; 39: 244-51. |
| 35. | Wu MM, Wang QM, Huang BY, et al. Dioscin ameliorates murine ulcerative colitis by regulating macrophage polarization. Pharmacol Res 2021; 172: 105796. |
| 36. |
Zhao Y, Xing C, Deng YT, Ye C, Peng H. HIF-1α signaling: Essential roles in tumorigenesis and implications in targeted therapies. Genes Dis 2024; 11: 234-51.
DOI PMID |
| 37. | Vatte S, Ugale R. HIF-1, an important regulator in potential new therapeutic approaches to ischemic stroke. Neurochem Int 2023; 170: 105605. |
| 38. | Yan YT, Yuan NN, Chen YC, et al. SKP alleviates the ferroptosis in diabetic kidney disease through suppression of HIF-1α/HO-1 pathway based on network pharmacology analysis and experimental validation. Chin Med 2024; 19: 31. |
| 39. | Zhou L, Zhao Y, Pan LC, et al. Sirolimus increases the anti-cancer effect of Huai Er by regulating hypoxia inducible factor-1α-mediated glycolysis in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28: 4600-19. |
| 40. |
Jia YJ, Chen JQ, Zheng ZK, et al. Tubular epithelial cell-derived extracellular vesicles induce macrophage glycolysis by stabilizing HIF-1α in diabetic kidney disease. Mol Med 2022; 28: 95.
DOI PMID |
| 41. |
Feng J, Li JJ, Wu LW, et al. Emerging roles and the regulation of aerobic glycolysis in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2020; 39: 126.
DOI PMID |
| 42. | Tu C, Wang LZ, WEI L. The role of PKM2 in diabetic microangiopathy. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes 2022; 15: 1405-12. |
| 43. |
Cramer T, Yamanishi Y, Clausen BE, et al. HIF-1alpha is essential for myeloid cell-mediated inflammation. Cell 2003; 112: 645-57.
DOI PMID |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
Sponsored by China Association of Chinese Medicine
& China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
16 Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimen Nei, Beijing, China. 100700 Email: jtcmen@126.com
Copyright 2020 Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine. All rights reserved.
